Regarder "Fahrenheit 9/11" 2004 Film VF Complet en HD

Bush than a dramatization of what Moore sees as a failed and dangerous presidency. The charges in the film will not come as news to those who pay attention to politics, but Moore illustrates them with dramatic images and a relentless commentary track that essentially concludes Bush is incompetent, dishonest, failing in the war on. With Dick Morris, Zell Miller, Ed Koch, Ron Silver.

In fact, Michael Moore may be angrier than he's ever been. And while a lot of that rage is directed at Donald Trump, it's probably less than people who have already commented on this review without seeing the film may expect if they ever choose to watch it. The people were polite, friendly, well-mannered (something we shouldn't take for granted on the part of contemporary theater.

Photograph: AP T he backlash to Michael Moore's thoroughly entertaining new film has had one of the longest and most elaborate gestation periods that I can remember. The film takes a critical look at the presidency of George W. Bush, the war in Iraq, and its coverage in the media. This film is a great example of how Moore uses Aristotle's three appeals pathos, logos, and ethos to gather information and supporting details to make his point evident. These appeals come together to amplify Moore's arguments and support his beliefs on politics. Disney has refused to release this film, other distributors also seem reluctant and - if Moore is to be believed - the White House wants to stop it being seen.

Trailer Fahrenheit 9/11

The New York Times Dana Stevens. Bush for personal character flaws, rather than destructive policy moves. In fact, the documentary is riddled with factual inaccuracies and deliberate deceptions that undermine the director's basic argument.

Call the film an interpretation of the facts if you must, if it makes you feel better, but it's an interpretation Sherlock Holmes would. A Bush apologia made with the same mixture of speculation and low blows wouldn't even have warranted an. I took that as a warning that we were in for a syrupy successor to "On Golden Pond," but I'm happy to say I. In addition, I identify some inaccuracies which have not been addressed by other writers.